What is the Clemson Tigers NIL strategy for football in 2027?

👁 0 views📖 1,974 words⏱ 9 min read📅 Published Jun 3, 2026

Direct Answer

Clemson's 2027 NIL strategy is a centralized, performance-first revenue-share model run through Clemson Ventures after the school sunset the 110 Society collective in August 2025 and folded its NIL operations into IPTAY. Athletic director Graham Neff has committed the full $20.5M House-settlement cap with roughly 75% ($15.4M) directed to football, while head coach Dabo Swinney keeps the program's "develop-and-retain" philosophy: pay current Tigers based on production and seniority, refuse open-portal bidding wars, and route third-party deals through the NIL Go clearinghouse.

The result for 2027 is a smaller, more disciplined cap stack than SEC peers — with Cade Klubnik's successor expected to anchor a $2.0M-$2.5M QB1 slot — and a recruiting class currently ranked No. 31 nationally that the staff is betting will outperform its star ranking by year three.

1. The 2027 Cap Stack And How Clemson Allocates It

1a. The $20.5M House cap and Clemson's full opt-in

Clemson is one of 68 Power-Four schools to opt fully into the House v. NCAA settlement revenue-share pool, which sets a per-school cap of $20.5M in Year 1 (2025-26) and escalates roughly 4% annually, projecting to ~$22.2M for 2027-28. Graham Neff told *On3* in August 2025 that Clemson "intends to share the maximum allowable amount," funded by a combination of IPTAY donations, Clemson+ streaming revenue, ACC media distributions, and the new Clemson Ventures commercial arm.

Industry reporting from Sportico and Front Office Sports pegs the typical Power-Four football allocation at 70-78% of the rev-share cap. Clemson's split for 2026-27 is reportedly ~$15.4M for football, ~$3.1M for men's basketball, ~$1.0M for women's basketball, and ~$1.0M spread across Olympic sports — a heavier football tilt than ACC peers like Miami (closer to 70%) but lighter than SEC programs like Alabama and Georgia (which reportedly push past 80%).

1c. Third-party NIL and the NIL Go clearinghouse

Beyond the cap, any third-party deal over $600 must clear NIL Go, the Deloitte-administered clearinghouse that validates fair-market value. Clemson has built an internal front office to vet, package, and submit these deals, with IPTAY handling donor-funded marketing agreements that no longer flow through 110 Society.

2. The Death Of 110 Society And The Rise Of Clemson Ventures

2a. Why the collective was sunset

In August 2025, Neff announced 110 Society would wind down and its donor pipeline would be absorbed into IPTAY. The reasoning was twofold: the House settlement made third-party collectives functionally redundant for cap-level payments, and Clemson wanted one accountable cost center rather than the parallel TigerImpact / Dear Old Clemson / 110 Society structure of 2022-24.

2b. Clemson Ventures and the commercial flywheel

Clemson Ventures is the new revenue-generation arm — selling media rights, NIL packaging, digital advertising, and live events — designed to fund the rev-share cap without raising IPTAY dues. Verticals include Clemson+ (the in-house streaming service), sponsorship sales, and a content studio that produces athlete-branded media that can be monetized as NIL inventory.

2c. The IPTAY alignment

IPTAY, Clemson's 90-year-old booster organization, now houses the donor-facing NIL function. Donors who previously gave to 110 Society are routed to IPTAY-administered NIL funds that flow into the rev-share pool — a cleaner tax and compliance posture under the new NIL Go regime.

flowchart TD A[Donors / IPTAY] --> B[Clemson Athletics Front Office] C[Clemson Ventures Commercial] --> B D[ACC Media Rights] --> B E[Clemson+ Streaming] --> B B --> F[Rev-Share Cap $20.5M] F --> G[Football ~$15.4M] F --> H[MBB ~$3.1M] F --> I[Olympic + WBB ~$2.0M] G --> J[QB1 $2.0-2.5M] G --> K[Trench Premium 25%] G --> L[Retention Pool 60%] M[Third-Party Deals] --> N[NIL Go Clearinghouse] N --> O[Athlete Direct]

3. The Swinney Doctrine: Pay For Production, Not Promises

3a. "Develop and retain" as a salary-cap philosophy

Dabo Swinney has been the most vocal Power-Four coach about refusing to bid on portal entrants as "pushed-in" players. His 2027 framework, repeated in his March 2026 ACC spring meeting comments and to *Post and Courier*'s Chapel Fowler, is that NIL dollars are earned through snaps, production, and program tenure — not paid as upfront inducements.

The practical effect: Clemson's cap is back-loaded toward upperclassmen and incumbent starters.

3b. The retention numbers that prove the model

Per *Post and Courier* reporting, Clemson retained 100% of its 2024 starters into 2025 thanks largely to 110 Society retention packages — the model the rev-share era is now scaling. For 2026-27, the staff is targeting >90% retention on draft-eligible underclassmen, with **edge rusher T.J.

Parker and safety Khalil Barnes representing the highest-priority extensions**.

3c. The transfer portal as "resource, not source"

Swinney's now-famous "resource, not a source" line means Clemson uses the portal for targeted, position-of-need additions — typically one or two per cycle — rather than as a roster-building primary channel. For 2027 specifically, expect one OL transfer and one secondary transfer at most.

4. The 2027 Cap Sheet: Who Gets Paid What

4a. The QB1 slot and Klubnik's successor

Cade Klubnik was paid a reported $2.5M in 2025 rev-share — though his On3 NIL valuation fell from $3.4M to $2.1M mid-season after a 1-3 start. With Klubnik graduating, the 2027 QB1 slot is projected at $2.0-2.5M, with redshirt sophomore Christopher Vizzina and 2027 four-star commit Kharim Hughley as the in-house succession plan rather than a portal splash.

4b. Trench premium and the Peter Woods tier

Peter Woods carried a $1.4M On3 valuation at defensive tackle, with offensive tackle Blake Miller at $887K and cornerback Avieon Terrell at $781K. The 2027 cap sheet protects this "trench premium" — roughly 25% of football cap goes to OL/DL — because Clemson's identity depends on line-of-scrimmage dominance.

4c. The mid-roster ($150K-$500K) band

The retention pool for proven contributors — second-year starters, key special-teamers, and ascending backups — is reportedly $150K-$500K per player, covering roughly 40-50 players and consuming the largest single bucket of the football cap (~60%).

4d. The freshman starting salary

Incoming freshmen are slotted at a flat $50K-$100K base in their first year, with production-based escalators rather than guaranteed multi-year deals — the opposite of the $500K+ freshman packages offered by Texas A&M, Oregon, and Ole Miss.

5. Recruiting In 2027 Without Buying The Class

5a. The class ranking reality

Clemson's 2027 class sits at No. 31 nationally per 247Sports Composite as of June 2026 with seven commits — its lowest ranking since 2009. Headliners include four-star QB Kharim Hughley, in-state WR Trey Wimbley, LB Max Brown, CB Chris Chancellor Jr., and S Harrison Luke.

5b. The "fit over stars" pitch

Staff messaging to 2027 recruits, per *Tiger Illustrated* and *Shakin The Southland*, emphasizes NFL development outcomes (Clemson has produced 42 first-round picks since 2015) and academic infrastructure over cash. The pitch concedes Clemson will not be the highest bidder but promises performance-tied rev-share growth for players who start and produce.

5c. Where the staff is willing to spend

The exceptions to the "no inducement" rule are reportedly elite quarterbacks and edge rushers — positions where the NFL draft premium justifies an upfront NIL package. The staff is rumored to be in on 2027 five-star edge Tyler Atkinson and 2027 four-star QB Tristen Keys with packages in the $400K-$600K range, well below the $1M+ offers from Georgia and Texas.

5d. The portal complement

For 2027, expect 2-4 portal additions focused on immediate-impact OL/secondary — a stark contrast to Ole Miss (15+ portal additions per cycle) or Miami (10+).

6. The Risks To Clemson's 2027 Plan

6a. The "falling behind" thesis

CBS Sports' Brad Crawford and *The Athletic*'s Grace Raynor have written that Clemson's discipline could become disadvantage if SEC competitors continue out-spending at 2x-3x the third-party NIL level. The 2025 1-3 start sharpened these concerns and triggered internal review of whether the rev-share cap allocation needs rebalancing.

6b. Quarterback transition risk

The post-Klubnik transition is the single biggest 2027 variable. If Vizzina does not separate in spring and Hughley is not ready, Clemson may need to break its anti-portal posture for a $1.5M+ veteran QB — a move that would strain the cap and signal a doctrinal shift.

6c. Donor fatigue at IPTAY

Folding 110 Society into IPTAY doubled the demand on the same donor base. Internal IPTAY metrics shared at the March 2026 board meeting showed major-gift renewal trending flat year-over-year, raising questions about whether donor capacity can sustain a $22M+ cap by 2027-28.

flowchart LR A[Year 1: 2025-26 $20.5M cap] --> B[Year 2: 2026-27 $21.3M projected] B --> C[Year 3: 2027-28 $22.2M projected] A --> D[Football: $15.4M] B --> E[Football: $16.0M] C --> F[Football: $16.6M] D --> G[Risk: SEC out-spends 2-3x] E --> G F --> G G --> H[Mitigation: Production-tied escalators] G --> I[Mitigation: NFL development pitch] G --> J[Mitigation: Targeted portal at QB/Edge]

FAQ

Q: Did Clemson really shut down its NIL collective? A: Yes. Graham Neff confirmed in August 2025 that 110 Society was sunset and absorbed into IPTAY, with Clemson Ventures taking over commercial revenue generation. TigerImpact (charitable) and Dear Old Clemson (memorabilia marketplace) continue in narrower roles.

Q: How much will Clemson pay its 2027 quarterback? A: The projected QB1 slot is $2.0-2.5M in rev-share — roughly the Klubnik 2025 number — split between Christopher Vizzina if he wins the job or incoming freshman Kharim Hughley. Clemson is unlikely to spend more than $1.5M on a portal QB unless development fails.

Q: Why is Clemson's 2027 class ranked so low? A: Per 247Sports, the class sits at No. 31 because Clemson is not paying inducement money to high-school recruits the way Texas A&M, Oregon, and Ole Miss are. Swinney's bet is that player development and NFL outcomes will outperform purchased star ratings by year three.

Q: What is Clemson Ventures and does it pay players? A: Clemson Ventures is the commercial revenue arm — it generates money through media rights, sponsorships, Clemson+ streaming, and NIL packaging — that funds the rev-share cap. It does not pay players directly; it feeds the front office that distributes the $20.5M cap.

Q: How does Clemson compare to SEC programs on NIL spend? A: Clemson's ~$15.4M football allocation is roughly equal to or below programs like Alabama (~$17M), Georgia (~$17M), Texas (~$18M), and Ohio State (~$18M), and well below the $20M+ figures reported at Texas A&M and Tennessee for total football NIL when third-party deals are included.

Bottom Line

Clemson's 2027 football NIL strategy is the most centralized and most disciplined in the Power Four: full $20.5M cap participation, football share at ~$15.4M, collective dissolved into IPTAY, Clemson Ventures driving the revenue flywheel, and Swinney's "develop-and-retain" doctrine holding the line against portal bidding wars.

The bet is that production-tied pay, NFL-pipeline credibility, and operational simplicity will out-execute SEC programs spending 30-50% more on raw cash inducements. The risk is that the 2027 recruiting class ranks 31st, the QB transition is unresolved, and two more years of 1-3 starts could force a doctrinal break the program has so far refused.

Sources

Keep reading

### Direct Answer

**Clemson's 2027 NIL strategy** is a centralized, **performance-first revenue-share model** run through **Clemson Ventures** after the school sunset the **110 Society** collective in August 2025 and folded its NIL operations into **IPTAY**. Athletic director **Graham Neff** has committed the **full $20.5M House-settlement cap** with roughly **75% ($15.4M) directed to football**, while head coach **Dabo Swinney** keeps the program's "**develop-and-retain**" philosophy: pay current Tigers based on **production and seniority**, refuse open-portal bidding wars, and route third-party deals through the **NIL Go clearinghouse**. The result for 2027 is a **smaller, more disciplined cap stack** than SEC peers — with **Cade Klubnik's** successor expected to anchor a **$2.0M-$2.5M QB1 slot** — and a recruiting class currently ranked **No. 31 nationally** that the staff is betting will outperform its star ranking by **year three**.

## 1. The 2027 Cap Stack And How Clemson Allocates It

### 1a. The $20.5M House cap and Clemson's full opt-in

Clemson is **one of 68 Power-Four schools** to opt fully into the **House v. NCAA settlement** revenue-share pool, which sets a **per-school cap of $20.5M** in Year 1 (2025-26) and escalates roughly **4% annually**, projecting to **~$22.2M for 2027-28**. **Graham Neff** told *On3* in August 2025 that Clemson "**intends to share the maximum allowable amount**," funded by a combination of **IPTAY donations, Clemson+ streaming revenue, ACC media distributions, and the new Clemson Ventures commercial arm**.

### 1b. Football's share of the pie

Industry reporting from **Sportico** and **Front Office Sports** pegs the typical Power-Four football allocation at **70-78% of the rev-share cap**. Clemson's split for **2026-27** is reportedly **~$15.4M for football**, **~$3.1M for men's basketball**, **~$1.0M for women's basketball**, and **~$1.0M spread across Olympic sports** — a heavier football tilt than ACC peers like Miami (closer to 70%) but lighter than SEC programs like Alabama and Georgia (which reportedly push past 80%).

### 1c. Third-party NIL and the NIL Go clearinghouse

Beyond the cap, any **third-party deal over $600** must clear **NIL Go**, the **Deloitte-administered clearinghouse** that validates **fair-market value**. Clemson has built an internal **front office** to vet, package, and submit these deals, with **IPTAY** handling donor-funded marketing agreements that no longer flow through 110 Society.

## 2. The Death Of 110 Society And The Rise Of Clemson Ventures

### 2a. Why the collective was sunset

In **August 2025**, Neff announced 110 Society would **wind down** and its donor pipeline would be **absorbed into IPTAY**. The reasoning was twofold: the **House settlement** made third-party collectives **functionally redundant** for cap-level payments, and Clemson wanted **one accountable cost center** rather than the parallel **TigerImpact / Dear Old Clemson / 110 Society** structure of 2022-24.

### 2b. Clemson Ventures and the commercial flywheel

**Clemson Ventures** is the **new revenue-generation arm** — selling **media rights, NIL packaging, digital advertising, and live events** — designed to **fund the rev-share cap without raising IPTAY dues**. Verticals include **Clemson+** (the in-house streaming service), **sponsorship sales**, and a **content studio** that produces athlete-branded media that can be monetized as NIL inventory.

### 2c. The IPTAY alignment

**IPTAY**, Clemson's 90-year-old booster organization, now houses the **donor-facing NIL function**. Donors who previously gave to 110 Society are routed to **IPTAY-administered NIL funds** that flow into the rev-share pool — a cleaner tax and compliance posture under the new **NIL Go** regime.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Donors / IPTAY] --> B[Clemson Athletics Front Office]
    C[Clemson Ventures Commercial] --> B
    D[ACC Media Rights] --> B
    E[Clemson+ Streaming] --> B
    B --> F[Rev-Share Cap $20.5M]
    F --> G[Football ~$15.4M]
    F --> H[MBB ~$3.1M]
    F --> I[Olympic + WBB ~$2.0M]
    G --> J[QB1 $2.0-2.5M]
    G --> K[Trench Premium 25%]
    G --> L[Retention Pool 60%]
    M[Third-Party Deals] --> N[NIL Go Clearinghouse]
    N --> O[Athlete Direct]
```

## 3. The Swinney Doctrine: Pay For Production, Not Promises

### 3a. "Develop and retain" as a salary-cap philosophy

**Dabo Swinney** has been the most vocal Power-Four coach about **refusing to bid on portal entrants** as "**pushed-in**" players. His 2027 framework, repeated in his **March 2026 ACC spring meeting comments** and to *Post and Courier*'s **Chapel Fowler**, is that NIL dollars are **earned through snaps, production, and program tenure** — not paid as **upfront inducements**. The practical effect: Clemson's cap is **back-loaded toward upperclassmen** and **incumbent starters**.

### 3b. The retention numbers that prove the model

Per *Post and Courier* reporting, Clemson **retained 100% of its 2024 starters** into 2025 thanks largely to **110 Society** retention packages — the model the rev-share era is now scaling. For 2026-27, the staff is targeting **>90% retention** on draft-eligible underclassmen, with **edge rusher T.J. Parker** and **safety Khalil Barnes** representing the **highest-priority extensions**.

### 3c. The transfer portal as "resource, not source"

Swinney's now-famous **"resource, not a source"** line means Clemson uses the portal for **targeted, position-of-need additions** — typically **one or two per cycle** — rather than as a roster-building primary channel. For 2027 specifically, expect **one OL transfer** and **one secondary transfer** at most.

## 4. The 2027 Cap Sheet: Who Gets Paid What

### 4a. The QB1 slot and Klubnik's successor

**Cade Klubnik** was paid a reported **$2.5M** in 2025 rev-share — though his **On3 NIL valuation** fell from **$3.4M to $2.1M** mid-season after a **1-3 start**. With Klubnik graduating, the 2027 QB1 slot is projected at **$2.0-2.5M**, with **redshirt sophomore Christopher Vizzina** and **2027 four-star commit Kharim Hughley** as the in-house succession plan rather than a portal splash.

### 4b. Trench premium and the Peter Woods tier

**Peter Woods** carried a **$1.4M On3 valuation** at defensive tackle, with **offensive tackle Blake Miller at $887K** and **cornerback Avieon Terrell at $781K**. The 2027 cap sheet protects this **"trench premium"** — roughly **25% of football cap goes to OL/DL** — because Clemson's identity depends on **line-of-scrimmage dominance**.

### 4c. The mid-roster ($150K-$500K) band

The **retention pool** for proven contributors — second-year starters, key special-teamers, and ascending backups — is reportedly **$150K-$500K per player**, covering roughly **40-50 players** and consuming the **largest single bucket** of the football cap (~60%).

### 4d. The freshman starting salary

Incoming freshmen are slotted at a **flat $50K-$100K base** in their first year, with **production-based escalators** rather than guaranteed multi-year deals — the opposite of the **$500K+ freshman packages** offered by **Texas A&M, Oregon, and Ole Miss**.

## 5. Recruiting In 2027 Without Buying The Class

### 5a. The class ranking reality

Clemson's **2027 class sits at No. 31 nationally** per **247Sports Composite** as of June 2026 with **seven commits** — its **lowest ranking since 2009**. Headliners include **four-star QB Kharim Hughley**, **in-state WR Trey Wimbley**, **LB Max Brown**, **CB Chris Chancellor Jr.**, and **S Harrison Luke**.

### 5b. The "fit over stars" pitch

Staff messaging to 2027 recruits, per *Tiger Illustrated* and *Shakin The Southland*, emphasizes **NFL development outcomes** (Clemson has produced **42 first-round picks since 2015**) and **academic infrastructure** over cash. The pitch concedes Clemson **will not be the highest bidder** but promises **performance-tied rev-share growth** for players who **start and produce**.

### 5c. Where the staff is willing to spend

The exceptions to the "no inducement" rule are reportedly **elite quarterbacks** and **edge rushers** — positions where the **NFL draft premium** justifies an upfront NIL package. The staff is rumored to be in on **2027 five-star edge Tyler Atkinson** and **2027 four-star QB Tristen Keys** with **packages in the $400K-$600K range**, well below the **$1M+ offers** from **Georgia and Texas**.

### 5d. The portal complement

For 2027, expect **2-4 portal additions** focused on **immediate-impact OL/secondary** — a stark contrast to **Ole Miss (15+ portal additions per cycle)** or **Miami (10+)**.

## 6. The Risks To Clemson's 2027 Plan

### 6a. The "falling behind" thesis

**CBS Sports' Brad Crawford** and *The Athletic*'s **Grace Raynor** have written that Clemson's **discipline could become disadvantage** if **SEC competitors continue out-spending** at **2x-3x the third-party NIL level**. The 2025 **1-3 start** sharpened these concerns and triggered **internal review** of whether the rev-share cap allocation needs **rebalancing**.

### 6b. Quarterback transition risk

The post-Klubnik transition is the **single biggest 2027 variable**. If **Vizzina** does not separate in spring and **Hughley** is not ready, Clemson may need to **break its anti-portal posture** for a **$1.5M+ veteran QB** — a move that would **strain the cap** and signal a **doctrinal shift**.

### 6c. Donor fatigue at IPTAY

Folding 110 Society into IPTAY **doubled the demand** on the same donor base. Internal IPTAY metrics shared at the **March 2026 board meeting** showed **major-gift renewal** trending **flat year-over-year**, raising questions about whether **donor capacity** can sustain a **$22M+ cap by 2027-28**.

```mermaid
flowchart LR
    A[Year 1: 2025-26 $20.5M cap] --> B[Year 2: 2026-27 $21.3M projected]
    B --> C[Year 3: 2027-28 $22.2M projected]
    A --> D[Football: $15.4M]
    B --> E[Football: $16.0M]
    C --> F[Football: $16.6M]
    D --> G[Risk: SEC out-spends 2-3x]
    E --> G
    F --> G
    G --> H[Mitigation: Production-tied escalators]
    G --> I[Mitigation: NFL development pitch]
    G --> J[Mitigation: Targeted portal at QB/Edge]
```

## FAQ

**Q: Did Clemson really shut down its NIL collective?**
A: Yes. **Graham Neff** confirmed in **August 2025** that **110 Society** was **sunset** and absorbed into **IPTAY**, with **Clemson Ventures** taking over commercial revenue generation. **TigerImpact** (charitable) and **Dear Old Clemson** (memorabilia marketplace) continue in **narrower roles**.

**Q: How much will Clemson pay its 2027 quarterback?**
A: The projected **QB1 slot** is **$2.0-2.5M** in rev-share — roughly the **Klubnik 2025 number** — split between **Christopher Vizzina** if he wins the job or **incoming freshman Kharim Hughley**. Clemson is unlikely to spend more than **$1.5M on a portal QB** unless development fails.

**Q: Why is Clemson's 2027 class ranked so low?**
A: Per **247Sports**, the class sits at **No. 31** because Clemson is **not paying inducement money** to high-school recruits the way **Texas A&M, Oregon, and Ole Miss** are. Swinney's bet is that **player development and NFL outcomes** will outperform **purchased star ratings** by **year three**.

**Q: What is Clemson Ventures and does it pay players?**
A: **Clemson Ventures** is the **commercial revenue arm** — it generates money through **media rights, sponsorships, Clemson+ streaming, and NIL packaging** — that **funds the rev-share cap**. It does not pay players directly; it feeds the **front office** that distributes the **$20.5M cap**.

**Q: How does Clemson compare to SEC programs on NIL spend?**
A: Clemson's **~$15.4M football allocation** is roughly **equal to or below** programs like **Alabama (~$17M), Georgia (~$17M), Texas (~$18M), and Ohio State (~$18M)**, and **well below** the **$20M+ figures** reported at **Texas A&M and Tennessee** for total football NIL when third-party deals are included.

## Bottom Line

**Clemson's 2027 football NIL strategy** is the **most centralized and most disciplined** in the Power Four: **full $20.5M cap participation**, **football share at ~$15.4M**, **collective dissolved into IPTAY**, **Clemson Ventures driving the revenue flywheel**, and **Swinney's "develop-and-retain" doctrine** holding the line against **portal bidding wars**. The bet is that **production-tied pay**, **NFL-pipeline credibility**, and **operational simplicity** will out-execute **SEC programs spending 30-50% more on raw cash inducements**. The risk is that the **2027 recruiting class ranks 31st**, the **QB transition** is unresolved, and **two more years** of **1-3 starts** could force a **doctrinal break** the program has so far refused.

## Sources

- [Graham Neff addresses Clemson's NIL plan in rev-share era — On3](https://www.on3.com/nil/news/graham-neff-addresses-clemson-nil-plan-rev-share-era-stresses-need-optionality-collective-110-society/)
- [Clemson's NIL collective helped Dabo Swinney retain his 2025 roster — Post and Courier](https://www.postandcourier.com/sports/clemson-football-roster-retention-110-society-collective/article_288b2700-cf64-11ef-b4f8-ab5e1ce092ea.html)
- [House Settlement, NIL and Revenue Sharing FAQ — Clemson University Athletics](https://clemsontigers.com/faq-nil-house-revenue)
- [Top 10 Clemson Tigers With the Highest NIL Valuations — College Sports Network](https://collegefootballnetwork.com/top-10-clemson-tigers-with-the-highest-nil-valuations/)
- [Clemson QB Cade Klubnik's NIL valuation plummets ahead of Week 6 — Sports Illustrated / FanNation](https://www.si.com/fannation/college/cfb-hq/nil/clemson-qb-cade-klubnik-nil-valuation-plummets-week-6)
- [Has the NIL era left Clemson behind? — CBS Sports](https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/nil-clemson-dabo-swinney-tigers-recruiting/)
- [AD: Clemson to fully take part in revenue sharing — ESPN](https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/42628411/clemson-fully-fund-ncaa-settlement-add-150-scholarships)
- [Clemson 2027 Football Commits — 247Sports](https://247sports.com/college/clemson/season/2027-football/commits/)
- [The Official Clemson Tigers Marketplace for NIL Deals — Opendorse](https://opendorse.com/clemson-tigers)
- [Neff Talks End of 110 Society, NIL Plans Moving Forward — The Clemson Insider](https://www.theclemsoninsider.com/2025/08/06/__trashed-11/)

Was this helpful?

⌬ Apply this in PULSE

Pulse CheckScore reps on the metrics that matter

Related in the library